Work Collection

Work Collection

Work Collection

Campus Eats

Campus Eats

Student-focused food delivery platform that lowers costs and boost sales through centralized group deliveries benefiting both students and local restaurants.

Student-focused food delivery platform that lowers costs and boost sales through centralized group deliveries benefiting both students and local restaurants.

Student-focused food delivery platform that lowers costs and boost sales through centralized group deliveries benefiting both students and local restaurants.

Cross-

sectoral

cooperation

Cross-

sectoral

cooperation

Cross-

sectoral

cooperation

+

+

Innovation

Innovation

Innovation

+

+

Iteration

Iteration

Iteration

Background

Campus Eats, a start-up incubated by University of Toronto Hatchery Program, is on a mission to revolutionize the food delivery services for students and small local vendors in Canada.

Time Period

Time Period

Time Period

2024.05 - 2024.08 (4 month)

Tool

Tool

Tool

Figma

Employment Type

Employment Type

Employment Type

Paid full-time Contract

My Major Contribution

  1. Designed and executed User research with students and local vendors

  2. Lead the Final Prototype Design for both User-end and Vendor-end

  3. Lead the Usability Testing and Iteration on Vendor-end prototype

  4. Build 0 to 1 Design Library

Product Overview

Challenges of Target user

Goal & Mission

User Goal:

Through scheduled group deliveries and centralized campus pick up, we aim to make food delivery more affordable, efficient, and accessible for [students] while helping [local merchants] increase sales and profitability.

Mission:

📍 Reduce food costs for students by offering group-buy discounts and eliminating high delivery fees.

📍 Support small restaurants by lowering commission fees and providing direct access to the student market.

📍 Optimize delivery efficiency by consolidating multiple orders into a single delivery run to campus pickup locations.

📍 Expand student dining options by creating a more sustainable and cost-effective alternative to traditional delivery platforms.

Project Timeline

Research

Provide evidence

Understand the Market

For Student:

Existing delivery platforms are costly and impractical for students due to high delivery fees, service fee and price markups

For Local Small Vendor:

Existing delivery platforms are unsustainable for small local vendors due to high commission fees and low visibility, forcing them to raise prices while struggling to attract customers.

What we must have?

Lower Costs for Students

Optimized Delivery Efficiency

HIgh exposure for Small Vendors

Customer Validation (Interview + Survey)

Method

User Survey

69 responses from students in GTA area

User Interview

12 interview from local small vendors in GTA area

Results

Insights

For Student

Lower food quality
than dine-in

65% of students report the portion of food often gets cut when ordering from a delivery platform. The quality are not worth the price

High additional cost

75% of student reported the top reason preventing them from ordering on platform is unreasonable service fee and delivery fee

🗣

"I only order delivery when there’s a promotion. Otherwise, the fees make it way too expensive."

🗣

“It just make no sense if I paid more but I end-up get less food and worse quality.

🗣

"I’d order food more often if the extra costs weren’t so high."

For Local Small Vendor

Low profit margin

75% of restaurants report that they must raise menu prices by 20-30% on delivery platforms to break even.

High exposure cost

5 out of 12 vendors reported struggling with limited market reach. They spend significantly on advertising to attract customers

Thirst for bulk order

2 out of 12 vendors mentioned actively looking for group order or event catering opportunities to boost sales

🗣

“I have to raise prices by 30% just to break even on delivery orders!”

🗣

“Willing to add promotion but can't afford for a long term.”

🗣

“We have experience preparing group orders but struggle to find more opportunities.”

Problem Redefine

Traditional food delivery platforms fail to serve students and small vendors effectively due to high costs, inefficient logistics, and limited market access.

Flow chart

Market Size Analysis

Define the Product

Take insights into Ideation

Our Solution: Order Intergration

Solution Diagram

User Journey Map

Customer Impact

For Student

Lower food cost

Group ordering and campus pickups reduce delivery and service fees, making meals more affordable.

More Flexible Dining

Scheduled pickups allow students to plan meals ahead, and access various meal options from local restaurants.

For Local Small Vendor

Higher Sales &
Customer Reach

Group orders and student demand increase order volume while reducing downtime during off-peak hours.

More Stable &
Predictable Revenue

Group orders and event catering create consistent sales opportunities, reducing reliance on seasonal peaks.

Design Principle

We build a “seamless user experience, system-driven optimization” approach with the most intuitive and automated order integration process.

Keep the experience familiar,
enhance efficiency behind the scenes.

70% of users persist a frictionless experience similar to existing delivery platforms without changing their habits.
Our design will prioritize automatic order integration, bulk discounts, and group deliveries—all managed by our system, not the user. The interface will remain intuitive, ensuring users get the benefits of cost savings and efficiency without any extra effort or learning curve.

MVP Prototype

Final Product User Flow

Final Product User Flow

User-end Flow

Vendor-end Flow

High-fi Prototype

High-fi Prototype

User-end

Vendor-end

Vendor-End Iteration

From Usability Testing to Redesign

Methodology

We Ask Our Restaurant-End Users to
Play Around with the Prototype & Think-Out-Aloud

We ask our Venodor-end users to
Play Around with the Prototype
Think-Out-Aloud

We ask our Venodor-end users to
Play Around with the Prototype
Think-Out-Aloud

"The Navigation Bar does not seem to reflect our daily usage habits." — Restaurant owner

The Navigation Bar seems not representing our daily using habits. — Restaurant owner

Usability Problem

The old navigation grouped unrelated features together, making Orders the only frequently accessed function. Other features like Home, Data, and Profile were used infrequently, taking up valuable space.

The old navigation grouped unrelated features together, making Orders the only frequently accessed function. Other features like Home, Data, and Profile were used infrequently, taking up valuable space.

Solution

—> Expanding the Orders section into a time-based workflow (New, In Progress, Ready, History) for a more intuitive experience.
—> Moving less frequently used features into a hamburger menu, reducing clutter and improving focus on daily tasks.

—> Expanding the Orders section into a time-based workflow (New, In Progress, Ready, History) for a more intuitive experience.
—> Moving less frequently used features into a hamburger menu, reducing clutter and improving focus on daily tasks.

Change Navigation System by Time-based Workflow

H Put Less Frequent Used Features into Hamburger Menu

Put Less Frequent Used Features into Hamburger Menu

Design Library

Fundamental for design

Colours Library

Colours Library

Typography

Typography

UI Component

UI Component

Emma Luo 2025

Toronto